Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

v3.4.0.3
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2016
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Principles of Consolidation

Principles of Consolidation

 

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Pressure BioSciences, Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiary PBI BioSeq, Inc. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

 

To prepare our condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, we are required to make significant estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. In addition, significant estimates were made in projecting future cash flows to quantify deferred tax assets, the costs associated with fulfilling our warranty obligations for the instruments that we sell, and the estimates employed in our calculation of fair value of stock options awarded and warrant derivative liability. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from the estimates and assumptions used.

Concentrations

Concentrations

 

Credit Risk

 

Our financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents, and trade receivables. We have cash investment policies which, among other things, limit investments to investment-grade securities. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers, and the risk with respect to trade receivables is further mitigated by the fact that many of our customers are government institutions, large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, and academic laboratories.

 

The following table illustrates the level of concentration as a percentage of total revenues during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

 

    For the Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2016     2015  
Top Five Customers     46 %     64 %
Federal Agencies     11 %     26 %

 

The following table illustrates the level of concentration as a percentage of net accounts receivable balance as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

 

    March 31, 2016     December, 31, 2015  
Top Five Customers     55 %     93 %
Federal Agencies     0 %     1 %

Product Supply

Product Supply

 

BIT Group, Inc. of California has been our sole contract manufacturer for our PCT NEP3229 and NEP2320 instrumentation. However, the Company has reached agreement for a Massachusetts-based contract manufacturer to assemble its future instrumentation builds starting with the new NEP2320 Extreme Barocycler instrument, effective in May 2016.

Investment in Available-For-Sale Equity Securities

Investment in Available-For-Sale Equity Securities

 

As of March 31, 2016, we held 601,500 shares of common stock of Everest Investments Holdings S.A. (“Everest”), a Polish publicly traded company listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange. We account for this investment in accordance with ASC 320 “Investments — Debt and Equity Securities” as securities available for sale. On March 31, 2016, our balance sheet reflected the fair value of our investment in Everest to be $154,824, based on the closing price of Everest shares of $0.26 per share on that day. The carrying value of our investment in Everest common stock held will change from period to period based on the closing price of the common stock of Everest as of the balance sheet date. This change in market value will be recorded by us on a quarterly basis as an unrealized gain or loss in Comprehensive Income or Loss.

Debt Issuance Costs

Debt Issuance Costs

 

In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs” (“ASU 2015-03”). ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs be presented as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability, consistent with the presentation of debt discounts. Prior to the issuance of ASU 2015-03, debt issuance costs were required to be presented as deferred charge assets, separate from the related debt liability. ASU 2015-03 does not change the recognition and measurement requirements for debt issuance costs. The Company early-adopted ASU 2015-03 as of the end of its Fiscal 2015, and applied its provisions retrospectively.

Computation of Loss per Share

Computation of Loss per Share

 

Basic loss per share is computed by dividing loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per share is computed by dividing loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued. For purposes of this calculation, convertible preferred stock, common stock dividends, and warrants and options to acquire common stock, are all considered common stock equivalents in periods in which they have a dilutive effect and are excluded from this calculation in periods in which these are anti-dilutive to our net loss.

 

The following table illustrates our computation of loss per share for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015:

 

    For the Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2016     2015  
Numerator:                
Net loss   $ (5,950,391 )   $ (2,047,455 )
Preferred dividends accrued     -       (16,668 )
Net loss applicable to common shareholders   $ (5,950,391 )   $ (2,064,123 )
                 
Denominator for basic and diluted loss per share:                
Weighted average common stock shares outstanding     23,198,360       18,840,390  
                 
Loss per common share - basic and diluted   $ (0.26 )   $ (0.11 )

 

The following table presents securities that could potentially dilute basic loss per share in the future. For all periods presented, the potentially dilutive securities were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share because these securities would have been anti-dilutive to our net loss. The Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, Series G Convertible Preferred Stock, Series H Convertible Preferred Stock, Series J Convertible Preferred Stock and Series K Convertible Preferred Stock are presented below as if they were converted into common shares according to the conversion terms.

 

    For the Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2016     2015  
Stock options     5,460,250       3,406,250  
Convertible debt     25,226,800       8,555,938  
Common stock warrants     26,998,401       19,182,201  
Convertible preferred stock:                
Series D Convertible Preferred Stock     750,000       750,000  
Series G Convertible Preferred Stock     865,700       865,700  
Series H Convertible Preferred Stock     1,000,000       1,000,000  
Series H2 Convertible Preferred Stock     2,100,000       2,100,000  
Series J Convertible Preferred Stock     3,546,000       3,546,000  
Series K Convertible Preferred Stock     11,416,000       11,416,000  
      77,363,151       50,822,089  

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Expense

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Expense

 

We maintain equity compensation plans under which incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options are granted to employees, independent members of our Board of Directors and outside consultants. We recognize stock-based compensation expense over the requisite service period using the Black-Scholes formula to estimate the fair value of the stock options on the date of grant.

Determining Fair Value of Stock Option Grants

Determining Fair Value of Stock Option Grants

 

Valuation and Amortization Method - The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model based on certain assumptions. The estimated fair value of employee stock options is amortized to expense using the straight-line method over the vesting period.

 

Expected Term - The Company uses the simplified calculation of expected life, as the Company does not currently have sufficient historical exercise data on which to base an estimate of expected term. Using this method, the expected term is determined using the average of the vesting period and the contractual life of the stock options granted.

 

Expected Volatility - Expected volatility is based on the Company’s historical stock volatility data over the expected term of the award.

 

Risk-Free Interest Rate - The Company bases the risk-free interest rate used in the Black-Scholes valuation method on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with an equivalent remaining term.

 

Forfeitures - The Company records stock-based compensation expense only for those awards that are expected to vest. The Company estimated a forfeiture rate of 5% for awards granted based on historical experience and future expectations of options vesting. The Company used this historical rate as our assumption in calculating future stock-based compensation expense.

  

The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $101,462 and $54,890 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The following table summarizes the effect of this stock-based compensation expense within each of the line items of our costs and expenses within our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations:

 

    For the Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
    2016     2015  
Research and development   $ 20,381     $ 11,343  
Selling and marketing     12,690       6,975  
General and administrative     68,391       36,572  
Total stock-based compensation expense   $ 101,462     $ 54,890  

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

Due to their short maturities, the carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued expenses approximate their fair value. Long-term liabilities are primarily related to convertible debentures and deferred revenue with carrying values that approximate fair value.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value Measurements

 

The Company follows the guidance of FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”) as it related to all financial assets and financial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis.

 

The Company generally defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The Company uses a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which classifies the inputs used in measuring fair values. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring the Company to develop its own assumptions.

  

Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company has determined that its financial assets are classified within Level 1 and its financial liabilities are currently classified within Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. The development of the unobservable inputs for Level 3 fair value measurements and fair value calculations are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

 

The following tables set forth the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2016:

 

          Fair value measurements at March 31, 2016 using:  
    March 31, 2016     Quoted
prices in
active
markets
(Level 1)
   

Significant
other
observable
inputs

(Level 2)

   

Significant
unobservable
inputs

(Level 3)

 
Available-For-Sale Equity Securities     154,824       154,824       -       -  
Total Financial Assets   $ 154,824     $ 154,824     $ -     $ -  

 

    March 31, 2016     Quoted
prices in
active
markets
(Level 1)
    Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
    Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
 
Series D Preferred Stock Purchase Warrants   $ 256,420       -       -     $ 256,420  
Warrants Issued with Convertible Debt     5,314,580       -       -       5,314,580  
Conversion Option Derivative Liabilities     7,028,206       -       -       7,028,206  
Total Derivatives   $ 12,599,206     $ -     $ -     $ 12,599,206  

 

The following table provides a summary of the changes in fair value, including net transfers in and/or out, of the derivative financial instruments, measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs for the three months ended March 31, 2016:

 

    December 31, 2015     Issuance
fair value
    Change in
fair value
    March 31, 2016  
Series D Preferred Stock Purchase Warrants   $ 173,526     $ -     $ 82,894     $ 256,420  
Warrants Issued with Convertible Debt     3,122,450       1,087,254       1,104,876       5,314,580  
Conversion Option Derivative Liabilities     3,940,791       1,535,290       1,552,125       7,028,206  
Total Derivatives   $ 7,236,767     $ 2,622,544     $ 2,739,895     $ 12,599,206  

 

The amounts above valued at issuance includes $1,328,495 that was charged directly to “change in fair value of derivative liabilities” at issuance.

 

The following tables set forth the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2015:

 

          Fair value measurements at December 31, 2015 using:  
    December 31, 2015     Quoted
prices in
active
markets
(Level 1)
   

Significant other observable inputs

(Level 2)

   

Significant
unobservable
inputs

(Level 3)

 
Available-For-Sale Equity Securities     294,522       294,522       -       -  
Total Financial Assets   $ 294,522     $ 294,522     $ -     $ -  
                                 
    December 31, 2015     Quoted
prices in
active
markets
(Level 1)
    Significant other
observable inputs
(Level 2)
    Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
 
Series D Preferred Stock Purchase Warrants   $ 173,526       -       -     $ 173,526  
Warrants Issued with Convertible Debt     3,122,450       -       -       3,122,450  
Conversion Option Derivative Liabilities     3,940,791       -       -       3,940,791  
Total Derivatives   $ 7,236,767     $ -     $ -     $ 7,236,767  

 

The following table provides a summary of the changes in fair value, including net transfers in and/or out, of the derivative financial instruments, measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs for the three months ended March 31, 2015:

 

    January 1, 2015     Change in Fair Value     Reclassified to Equity     March 31, 2015  
Series D Preferred Stock Purchase Warrants   $ 159,875     $ 51,031       -     $ 210,906  
                                 

 

The assumptions for the binomial pricing model are represented in the table below for the warrants issued in the Series D private placement reflected on a per share common stock equivalent basis.

 

Assumptions   November 10, 2011     Warrants revalued at
December 31, 2015
    Warrants revalued at
March 31, 2016
 
Expected life (in months)     60.0       11.0       7.0  
Expected volatility     104.5 %     104.9 %     103.6 %
Risk-free interest rate     0.875 %     0.65 %     0.39 %
Exercise price   $ 0.81     $ 0.25     $ 0.25  
Fair value per warrant   $ 0.54     $ 0.16     $ 0.24  

 

The assumptions for the binomial pricing model are represented in the table below for the warrants issued with the Convertible Debt throughout the period reflected on a per share common stock equivalent basis.

 

 

Assumptions   At Issuance Fair value     Warrants revalued at December 31, 2015     Warrants revalued at
March 31, 2016
 
Expected life (in months)     60.0       55.0-60.0       48.0-60.0  
Expected volatility     118.3 - 138.3 %     136.3-141.6 %     138.3 -142.2 %
Risk-free interest rate     1.23-1.69 %     1.29-1.76 %     1.21 %
Exercise price   $ 0.40       0.40     $ 0.40  
Fair value per warrant     $ 0.19-$.40       0.30     $ 0.40  

 

The assumptions for the binomial pricing model are represented in the table below for the conversion options reflected on a per share common stock equivalent basis.

 

Assumptions   At Issuance
fair value
    Conversion options revalued at December 31, 2015     Conversion options
revalued at
March 31, 2016
 
Expected life (in months)     6-24       18-24       12-24  
Expected volatility     104.2-153.8 %     112.2-114.7 %     112.03-113.67 %
Risk-free interest rate     0.05-0.99 %     1.06 %     0.59-0.73 %
Exercise price     $0.28-$0.35     $ 0.28     $ 0.28  
Fair value per conversion option     $0.09-$0.30       $0.14-$0.33       $0.27-$0.30